North Dakota State
W-L: ( 4- 7) PR = 92.1771Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 221 A Minnesota B10 (16-36, 91.2) 5- 4 221 A Iowa State B12 (33-21, 94.1) 5- 6 306 A UNLV MW (29-21, 91.5) 2- 7 307 H Utah Tech WAC (20-31, 89.2) 10- 2 307 A UNLV MW (29-21, 91.5) 14- 7 308 A Utah Tech WAC (20-31, 89.2) 5- 9 313 A California Baptist WAC (37-19, 93.2) 1- 2 313 A California Baptist WAC (37-19, 93.2) 5- 0 314 A California Baptist WAC (37-19, 93.2) 1- 2 327 H Troy SB (31-20, 92.8) 1- 2 328 H New Mexico MW (26-27, 92.2) 0- 9
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
221 A Minnesota 5- 4 1 0 0.77
221 A Iowa State 5- 6 -1 -3 1.62
306 A UNLV 2- 7 -5 0 -- -4.93
307 H Utah Tech 10- 2 8 4 ++ 4.27
307 A UNLV 14- 7 7 0 +++ 7.07
308 A Utah Tech 5- 9 -4 2 --- -6.24
313 A California Baptist 1- 2 -1 -2 0.78
313 A California Baptist 5- 0 5 -2 +++ 6.78
314 A California Baptist 1- 2 -1 -2 0.78
327 H Troy 1- 2 -1 0 -1.16
328 H New Mexico 0- 9 -9 1 --- -9.72
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 308 A Utah Tech 5- 9 -4 2 --- -6.24 328 H New Mexico 0- 9 -9 1 --- -9.72 306 A UNLV 2- 7 -5 0 -- -4.93 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 307 A UNLV 14- 7 7 0 +++ 7.07 313 A California Baptist 5- 0 5 -2 +++ 6.78 307 H Utah Tech 10- 2 8 4 ++ 4.27 |
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 25.20
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
3 A Minnesota (16-36, 91.2) 5- 4 -8.70 10.67 0.74 2.29 52.31
3 A Iowa State (33-21, 94.1) 5- 6 -5.85 13.52 0.74 2.29 -5.85
3 A UNLV (29-21, 91.5) 2- 7 -8.39 10.98 0.74 2.29 -8.76
3 H Utah Tech (20-31, 89.2) 10- 2 -10.71 8.66 -0.74 2.29 36.30
3 A UNLV (29-21, 91.5) 14- 7 -8.39 10.98 0.74 2.29 53.71
3 A Utah Tech (20-31, 89.2) 5- 9 -10.71 8.66 0.74 2.29 -11.42
3 A California Bap (37-19, 93.2) 1- 2 -6.69 12.68 0.74 2.29 -6.81
3 A California Bap (37-19, 93.2) 5- 0 -6.69 12.68 0.74 2.29 61.51
3 A California Bap (37-19, 93.2) 1- 2 -6.69 12.68 0.74 2.29 -6.81
3 H Troy (31-20, 92.8) 1- 2 -7.14 12.23 -0.74 2.29 -9.03
3 H New Mexico (26-27, 92.2) 0- 9 -7.70 11.67 -0.74 2.29 -9.68
------
145.45
|
winning pts = 203.8167 losing points = -58.3691
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------