Saint Francis
W-L: ( 0-11) PR = 86.7434Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 213 A Utah State MW (22-32, 89.4) 4- 5 213 A California Baptist WAC (37-19, 93.2) 3- 6 214 A California Baptist WAC (37-19, 93.2) 0- 4 227 H UT Arlington WAC (25-22, 91.1) 0- 8 227 A New Mexico State CUSA (26-26, 91.9) 2-10 228 A UTSA AC (24-33, 90.4) 6- 9 301 A UTSA AC (24-33, 90.4) 9-11 301 A UTSA AC (24-33, 90.4) 9-11 304 A Texas State SB (36-23, 93.6) 0- 7 305 H Tarleton State WAC (35-22, 91.5) 0-11 421 A Penn State B10 (32-22, 95.0) 0-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
213 A Utah State 4- 5 -1 -3 + 2.40
213 A California Baptist 3- 6 -3 -7 ++ 4.21
214 A California Baptist 0- 4 -4 -7 + 3.21
227 H UT Arlington 0- 8 -8 -4 -- -4.34
227 A New Mexico State 2-10 -8 -6 - -2.09
228 A UTSA 6- 9 -3 -4 1.35
301 A UTSA 9-11 -2 -4 + 2.35
301 A UTSA 9-11 -2 -4 + 2.35
304 A Texas State 0- 7 -7 -8 0.61
305 H Tarleton State 0-11 -11 -4 --- -7.01
421 A Penn State 0-12 -12 -9 - -3.04
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 305 H Tarleton State 0-11 -11 -4 --- -7.01 227 H UT Arlington 0- 8 -8 -4 -- -4.34 227 A New Mexico State 2-10 -8 -6 - -2.09 421 A Penn State 0-12 -12 -9 - -3.04 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 213 A California Baptist 3- 6 -3 -7 ++ 4.21 213 A Utah State 4- 5 -1 -3 + 2.40 214 A California Baptist 0- 4 -4 -7 + 3.21 301 A UTSA 9-11 -2 -4 + 2.35 301 A UTSA 9-11 -2 -4 + 2.35 |
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 25.20
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
3 A Utah State (22-32, 89.4) 4- 5 -10.50 8.87 0.74 2.29 -11.18
3 A California Bap (37-19, 93.2) 3- 6 -6.69 12.68 0.74 2.29 -6.81
3 A California Bap (37-19, 93.2) 0- 4 -6.69 12.68 0.74 2.29 -6.81
3 H UT Arlington (25-22, 91.1) 0- 8 -8.75 10.62 -0.74 2.29 -10.88
3 A New Mexico Sta (26-26, 91.9) 2-10 -7.98 11.39 0.74 2.29 -8.30
3 A UTSA (24-33, 90.4) 6- 9 -9.55 9.82 0.74 2.29 -10.09
3 A UTSA (24-33, 90.4) 9-11 -9.55 9.82 0.74 2.29 -10.09
3 A UTSA (24-33, 90.4) 9-11 -9.55 9.82 0.74 2.29 -10.09
3 A Texas State (36-23, 93.6) 0- 7 -6.29 13.08 0.74 2.29 -6.36
3 H Tarleton State (35-22, 91.5) 0-11 -8.43 10.94 -0.74 2.29 -10.50
3 A Penn State (32-22, 95.0) 0-12 -4.94 14.43 0.74 2.29 -4.81
------
-95.92
|
winning pts = 0.0000 losing points = -95.9174
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------